![]() |
|
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Author | ||||||
tkashmore ![]() Rank 3 ![]() ![]() Joined: 07/May/2008 Location: Southampton Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
![]() |
|||||
We have looked into the following requests for additional headings: Vehicle Management - I see no category that would fit hiring of vehicles, could you suggest an existing category or please create a new one at Level 2 - Please provide a valid reason why 'Leasing' is not adequate?
Social Community Care Supplies & Services – Adult - Please add Mental Health Services at Level 3 - Agree
Social Community Care Supplies & Services – Children - Please add Advice & Counselling Services at Level 3 - Agree |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Chris Whiley ![]() Rank 2 ![]() Joined: 08/May/2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 14 |
![]() |
|||||
Surely the right thing to do in these circumstances is to seek corrected behaviour, not scrap a perfectly good and useful set of codes?
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Jeff ![]() Admin Group ![]() ![]() Joined: 29/Apr/2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 30 |
![]() |
|||||
Draft version C9.1.4 is now available to download from the ProClass website. Please click HERE to discuss this new draft.
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
tkashmore ![]() Rank 3 ![]() ![]() Joined: 07/May/2008 Location: Southampton Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
![]() |
|||||
The original two principles of ProClass are to: 1. Target and provide information on high value expenditure 2. Have a hierarchy based around service departments (e.g. Housing, Leisure, Social Care) The heading of ‘Consultancy’ should really only reflect expenditure of a general nature not covered by other headings. Unfortunately it contained many headings that were also within the service department headings. This was leading to confusion as to where this expenditure should be allocated As we are not in a position to correct anyone’s behaviour. We have to ensure two things:
That is why the changes have taken place in ‘Consultancy’. They have not been ‘scrapped’ merely moved to more appropriate place in the classification |
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Susan4011 ![]() Rank 1 ![]() Joined: 13/May/2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 3 |
![]() |
|||||
We have just found out the hard way that you have reused number codes from version 8 for version 9. As we use ProClass this means for example that on loading your new table we are now sending Security spend to Retail!
V 8
Do you have a table that maps from V 8.2 to V 9.1?
Regards
Susan
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
Chris Whiley ![]() Rank 2 ![]() Joined: 08/May/2008 Online Status: Offline Posts: 14 |
![]() |
|||||
Susan A number of people expressed anxiety about this when version 9 was announced but as I read Terry's response dated 11.43 am on 6 May the relationships between headings and numbers was going to be retained.
Terry - what happened?
|
||||||
![]() |
||||||
tkashmore ![]() Rank 3 ![]() ![]() Joined: 07/May/2008 Location: Southampton Online Status: Offline Posts: 31 |
![]() |
|||||
It was agreed that that the numbers of moved headings would be retained after version C8.3 to solve this very problem. All older versions allowed numbers to be changed. Unfortunately we have no facility to keep all the older versions mapped to the current one. It will not happen to any versions later than C8.3.
|
||||||
![]() |
Post Reply ![]() |
Page <12 |
Forum Jump | Forum Permissions ![]() You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |